WallStSmart

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsLanvin Group Holdings Limited (LANV)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd generates 463248% more annual revenue ($1.04T vs $225.53M). BABA leads profitability with a 7.0% profit margin vs -99.6%. BABA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

BABA

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.5Value: 8.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.02

LANV

Avoid

28

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -5.01
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BABAUndervalued (+58.1%)

Margin of Safety

+58.1%

Fair Value

$363.49

Current Price

$113.24

$250.25 discount

UndervaluedFair: $363.49Overvalued
LANVUndervalued (+29.3%)

Margin of Safety

+29.3%

Fair Value

$2.12

Current Price

$1.08

$1.04 discount

UndervaluedFair: $2.12Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BABA4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$281.47B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.528/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

LANV0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

BABA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
7.0%3/10

ROE of 7.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

LANV4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$148.16M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-285.3%2/10

ROE of -285.3% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-12.9%2/10

Revenue declined 12.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BABA

The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.52 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LANV

LANV has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : BABA

The primary concerns for BABA are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : LANV

The primary concerns for LANV are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BABA profiles as a value stock while LANV is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

BABA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.50 — expect wider price swings.

BABA is growing revenue faster at 8.6% — sustainability is the question.

LANV generates stronger free cash flow (-110M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BABA scores higher overall (55/100 vs 28/100). LANV offers better value entry with a 29.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LUXURY GOODS · USA

Lanvin Group Holdings Limited manufactures and sells fashion apparel, accessories, and fragrances for men and women.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?