Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsJD.com Inc Adr (JD)
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
$127.28
+4.11%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $293.02B
JD
JD.com Inc Adr
$33.01
+2.17%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $43.63B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
JD.com Inc Adr generates 29% more annual revenue ($1.32T vs $1.02T). BABA leads profitability with a 10.1% profit margin vs 1.1%. BABA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.48. BABA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).
BABA
Buy64
out of 100
Grade: C+
JD
Buy50
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+59.5%
Fair Value
$375.80
Current Price
$127.28
$248.52 discount
Margin of Safety
+76.4%
Fair Value
$119.90
Current Price
$33.01
$86.89 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Growing faster than its price suggests
Earnings expanding 104.1% YoY
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Reasonable price relative to book value
Growing faster than its price suggests
Areas to Watch
2.9% revenue growth
Operating margin of 1.0%
Weak financial health signals
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
4.9% revenue growth
ROE of 6.4% — below average capital efficiency
1.1% margin — thin
Operating margin of 1.2%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BABA
The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.48 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : JD
The strongest argument for JD centers on Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.82 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : BABA
The primary concerns for BABA are Revenue Growth, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : JD
The primary concerns for JD are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 1.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BABA carries more volatility with a beta of 0.50 — expect wider price swings.
JD is growing revenue faster at 4.9% — sustainability is the question.
JD generates stronger free cash flow (-4.5B), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor INTERNET RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
BABA scores higher overall (64/100 vs 50/100). JD offers better value entry with a 76.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.
JD.com Inc Adr
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · China
JD.com, Inc. is an e-commerce company and retail infrastructure service provider in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, China.
Compare with Other INTERNET RETAIL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?