Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsJacktel AS (JACK)
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
$130.43
-0.32%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $321.85B
JACK
Jacktel AS
$12.60
+2.44%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $252.16M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd generates 70323% more annual revenue ($1.02T vs $1.44B). BABA leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs -8.1%. JACK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.37. BABA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).
BABA
Buy50
out of 100
Grade: C-
JACK
Hold40
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+72.9%
Fair Value
$562.19
Current Price
$130.43
$431.76 discount
Margin of Safety
+63.4%
Fair Value
$56.36
Current Price
$12.60
$43.76 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Growing faster than its price suggests
Areas to Watch
1.7% revenue growth
Earnings declined 70.9%
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency
Revenue declined 5.8%
Earnings declined 73.6%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BABA
The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.80 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : JACK
The strongest argument for JACK centers on PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.37 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : BABA
The primary concerns for BABA are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.
Bear Case : JACK
The primary concerns for JACK are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BABA profiles as a value stock while JACK is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.
JACK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.34 — expect wider price swings.
BABA is growing revenue faster at 1.7% — sustainability is the question.
JACK generates stronger free cash flow (-5M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BABA scores higher overall (50/100 vs 40/100). JACK offers better value entry with a 63.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.
Jacktel AS
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
Jack in the Box Inc. operates and franchises Jack in the Box quick service restaurants. The company is headquartered in San Diego, California.
Compare with Other INTERNET RETAIL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?