Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsBrinker International Inc (EAT)
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
$115.75
+2.22%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $281.47B
EAT
Brinker International Inc
$200.49
+1.82%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $9.29B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd generates 17894% more annual revenue ($1.04T vs $5.81B). EAT leads profitability with a 8.4% profit margin vs 7.0%. BABA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.53. EAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).
BABA
Buy55
out of 100
Grade: C-
EAT
Buy61
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+58.1%
Fair Value
$363.49
Current Price
$115.75
$247.74 discount
Intrinsic value data unavailable for EAT.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Every $100 of equity generates 114 in profit
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Earnings expanding 29.4% YoY
Areas to Watch
Moderate valuation
ROE of 7.0% — below average capital efficiency
7.0% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Trading at 19.1x book value
Elevated debt levels
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BABA
The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.53 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : EAT
The strongest argument for EAT centers on Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : BABA
The primary concerns for BABA are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.
Bear Case : EAT
The primary concerns for EAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 3.96 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
EAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.
BABA is growing revenue faster at 8.6% — sustainability is the question.
EAT generates stronger free cash flow (159M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor INTERNET RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
EAT scores higher overall (61/100 vs 55/100). BABA offers better value entry with a 58.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.
Brinker International Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
Brinker International, Inc. owns, develops, operates and franchises casual dining restaurants in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Visit Website →Compare with Other INTERNET RETAIL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?