Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsDine Brands Global Inc (DIN)
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
$130.43
-0.32%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $321.85B
DIN
Dine Brands Global Inc
$27.32
-0.98%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $369.34M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd generates 115531% more annual revenue ($1.02T vs $879.30M). BABA leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs 1.9%. BABA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.80. DIN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).
BABA
Buy50
out of 100
Grade: C-
DIN
Hold50
out of 100
Grade: D+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+72.9%
Fair Value
$562.19
Current Price
$130.43
$431.76 discount
Margin of Safety
+57.3%
Fair Value
$81.28
Current Price
$27.32
$53.96 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Growing faster than its price suggests
Reasonable price relative to book value
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Areas to Watch
1.7% revenue growth
Earnings declined 70.9%
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Moderate valuation
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency
1.9% margin — thin
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BABA
The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.80 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : DIN
The strongest argument for DIN centers on Debt/Equity. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : BABA
The primary concerns for BABA are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.
Bear Case : DIN
The primary concerns for DIN are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Thin 1.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
DIN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.98 — expect wider price swings.
DIN is growing revenue faster at 6.3% — sustainability is the question.
DIN generates stronger free cash flow (-9M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor INTERNET RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
BABA scores higher overall (50/100 vs 50/100). DIN offers better value entry with a 57.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.
Dine Brands Global Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
Dine Brands Global, Inc. owns, franchises, operates and leases full service restaurants in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Glendale, California.
Visit Website →Compare with Other INTERNET RETAIL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?