WallStSmart

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (BABA)vsDana Inc (DAN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd generates 13457% more annual revenue ($1.02T vs $7.50B). BABA leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs 1.1%. BABA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.81. BABA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

BABA

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 8.0Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.39

DAN

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 3.5Value: 3.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BABAUndervalued (+72.8%)

Margin of Safety

+72.8%

Fair Value

$558.77

Current Price

$140.06

$418.71 discount

UndervaluedFair: $558.77Overvalued
DANOvervalued (-10.7%)

Margin of Safety

-10.7%

Fair Value

$30.16

Current Price

$34.70

$4.54 premium

UndervaluedFair: $30.16Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BABA4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$349.01B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

PEG RatioValuation
0.818/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$6.76B8/10

Generating 6.8B in free cash flow

DAN1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
2205.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 2205.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

BABA2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.7%4/10

1.7% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
-70.9%2/10

Earnings declined 70.9%

DAN4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Profit MarginProfitability
1.1%3/10

1.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.2%3/10

Operating margin of 4.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.852/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BABA

The strongest argument for BABA centers on Market Cap, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.81 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : DAN

The strongest argument for DAN centers on EPS Growth.

Bear Case : BABA

The primary concerns for BABA are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : DAN

The primary concerns for DAN are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 1.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DAN carries more volatility with a beta of 2.04 — expect wider price swings.

DAN is growing revenue faster at 5.2% — sustainability is the question.

BABA generates stronger free cash flow (6.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor INTERNET RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

BABA scores higher overall (50/100 vs 49/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Alibaba Group Holding Limited, also known as Alibaba Group and Alibaba.com, is a Chinese multinational technology company specializing in e-commerce, retail, Internet, and technology. Founded on 28 June 1999 in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, the company provides consumer-to-consumer (C2C), business-to-consumer (B2C), and business-to-business (B2B) sales services via web portals, as well as electronic payment services, shopping search engines and cloud computing services. It owns and operates a diverse portfolio of companies around the world in numerous business sectors.

Dana Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO PARTS · USA

Dana Incorporated provides energy management and energy transportation solutions for vehicles and machinery in North America, Europe, South America, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Maumee, Ohio.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?