WallStSmart

AstraZeneca PLC (AZN)vsSutro Biopharma (STRO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

AstraZeneca PLC generates 134174% more annual revenue ($61.37B vs $45.70M). AZN leads profitability with a 17.0% profit margin vs 0.0%. AZN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

AZN

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.48

STRO

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.5Value: 6.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -9.67
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AZNUndervalued (+18.4%)

Margin of Safety

+18.4%

Fair Value

$196.10

Current Price

$160.17

$35.93 discount

UndervaluedFair: $196.10Overvalued
STROUndervalued (+29.2%)

Margin of Safety

+29.2%

Fair Value

$22.23

Current Price

$16.86

$5.37 discount

UndervaluedFair: $22.23Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AZN4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$252.33B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
20.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
23.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.5%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.13B8/10

Generating 2.1B in free cash flow

STRO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-0.1010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

AZN2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
2.5%4/10

2.5% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.482/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

STRO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$340.58M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AZN

The strongest argument for AZN centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.0% and operating margin at 23.5%. PEG of 1.28 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : STRO

The strongest argument for STRO centers on Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : AZN

The primary concerns for AZN are EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : STRO

The primary concerns for STRO are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AZN profiles as a mature stock while STRO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

STRO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.51 — expect wider price swings.

AZN is growing revenue faster at 6.4% — sustainability is the question.

AZN generates stronger free cash flow (2.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AZN scores higher overall (60/100 vs 30/100), backed by strong 17.0% margins. STRO offers better value entry with a 29.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AstraZeneca PLC

HEALTHCARE · DRUG MANUFACTURERS - GENERAL · USA

AstraZeneca PLC discovers, develops, manufactures and markets prescription drugs in the areas of oncology, cardiovascular, renal and metabolism, respiratory, infections, neuroscience and gastroenterology worldwide. The company is headquartered in Cambridge, the United Kingdom.

Sutro Biopharma

HEALTHCARE · BIOTECHNOLOGY · USA

Sutro Biopharma, Inc. is a clinical stage drug discovery, development and manufacturing company. The company is headquartered in South San Francisco, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?