WallStSmart

AstraZeneca PLC (AZN)vsSutro Biopharma (STRO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

AstraZeneca PLC generates 60577% more annual revenue ($60.44B vs $99.61M). AZN leads profitability with a 17.2% profit margin vs -154.2%. AZN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

AZN

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.48

STRO

Avoid

26

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -8.76
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AZNUndervalued (+8.2%)

Margin of Safety

+8.2%

Fair Value

$194.77

Current Price

$185.95

$8.82 discount

UndervaluedFair: $194.77Overvalued
STROUndervalued (+68.5%)

Margin of Safety

+68.5%

Fair Value

$49.91

Current Price

$26.09

$23.82 discount

UndervaluedFair: $49.91Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AZN4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$282.69B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
21.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
27.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.82B8/10

Generating 1.8B in free cash flow

STRO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-0.2010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

AZN2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.5x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.482/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

STRO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$432.32M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-1810.0%2/10

ROE of -1810.0% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AZN

The strongest argument for AZN centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.2% and operating margin at 27.9%. Revenue growth of 12.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : STRO

The strongest argument for STRO centers on Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : AZN

The primary concerns for AZN are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : STRO

The primary concerns for STRO are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AZN profiles as a mature stock while STRO is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

STRO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.55 — expect wider price swings.

AZN is growing revenue faster at 12.5% — sustainability is the question.

AZN generates stronger free cash flow (1.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AZN scores higher overall (64/100 vs 26/100), backed by strong 17.2% margins and 12.5% revenue growth. STRO offers better value entry with a 68.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AstraZeneca PLC

HEALTHCARE · DRUG MANUFACTURERS - GENERAL · USA

AstraZeneca PLC discovers, develops, manufactures and markets prescription drugs in the areas of oncology, cardiovascular, renal and metabolism, respiratory, infections, neuroscience and gastroenterology worldwide. The company is headquartered in Cambridge, the United Kingdom.

Sutro Biopharma

HEALTHCARE · BIOTECHNOLOGY · USA

Sutro Biopharma, Inc. is a clinical stage drug discovery, development and manufacturing company. The company is headquartered in South San Francisco, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?