WallStSmart

AstraZeneca PLC (AZN)vsEDAP TMS SA (EDAP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

AstraZeneca PLC generates 81495% more annual revenue ($60.44B vs $74.07M). AZN leads profitability with a 17.2% profit margin vs -41.7%. AZN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.39. AZN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

AZN

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.48

EDAP

Avoid

25

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AZNUndervalued (+8.2%)

Margin of Safety

+8.2%

Fair Value

$194.77

Current Price

$185.95

$8.82 discount

UndervaluedFair: $194.77Overvalued
EDAPUndervalued (+41.7%)

Margin of Safety

+41.7%

Fair Value

$8.41

Current Price

$4.31

$4.10 discount

UndervaluedFair: $8.41Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AZN4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$282.69B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
21.9%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
27.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.82B8/10

Generating 1.8B in free cash flow

EDAP0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

AZN2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
27.5x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.482/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

EDAP4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

Market CapQuality
$156.30M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

PEG RatioValuation
90.472/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-124.0%2/10

ROE of -124.0% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AZN

The strongest argument for AZN centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.2% and operating margin at 27.9%. Revenue growth of 12.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : EDAP

Revenue growth of 13.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AZN

The primary concerns for AZN are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : EDAP

The primary concerns for EDAP are Price/Book, Market Cap, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AZN profiles as a mature stock while EDAP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

AZN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.21 — expect wider price swings.

EDAP is growing revenue faster at 13.9% — sustainability is the question.

AZN generates stronger free cash flow (1.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AZN scores higher overall (64/100 vs 25/100), backed by strong 17.2% margins and 12.5% revenue growth. EDAP offers better value entry with a 41.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AstraZeneca PLC

HEALTHCARE · DRUG MANUFACTURERS - GENERAL · USA

AstraZeneca PLC discovers, develops, manufactures and markets prescription drugs in the areas of oncology, cardiovascular, renal and metabolism, respiratory, infections, neuroscience and gastroenterology worldwide. The company is headquartered in Cambridge, the United Kingdom.

EDAP TMS SA

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION · USA

EDAP TMS SA, develops, produces, markets, distributes and maintains a portfolio of minimally invasive medical devices for the treatment of urological diseases in Asia, France, the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Lyon, France.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?