WallStSmart

Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO)vsMDU Resources Group Inc (MDU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Atmos Energy Corporation generates 160% more annual revenue ($4.87B vs $1.88B). ATO leads profitability with a 25.7% profit margin vs 10.2%. ATO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.16. ATO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

ATO

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 8.0Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.10

MDU

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 10.0Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.99
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ATOOvervalued (-5.2%)

Margin of Safety

-5.2%

Fair Value

$167.29

Current Price

$181.55

$14.26 premium

UndervaluedFair: $167.29Overvalued
MDUUndervalued (+52.9%)

Margin of Safety

+52.9%

Fair Value

$43.52

Current Price

$20.55

$22.97 discount

UndervaluedFair: $43.52Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ATO3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
38.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 38.9%

Profit MarginProfitability
25.7%9/10

Keeps 26 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MDU3 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
20.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
39.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 39.4% YoY

Areas to Watch

ATO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.164/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-725.29M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.102/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

MDU4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.464/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.0%3/10

ROE of 7.0% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.3%2/10

Revenue declined 0.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ATO

The strongest argument for ATO centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.7% and operating margin at 38.9%. Revenue growth of 14.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MDU

The strongest argument for MDU centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : ATO

The primary concerns for ATO are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : MDU

The primary concerns for MDU are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ATO profiles as a mature stock while MDU is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

ATO carries more volatility with a beta of 0.70 — expect wider price swings.

ATO is growing revenue faster at 14.2% — sustainability is the question.

MDU generates stronger free cash flow (-358M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ATO scores higher overall (64/100 vs 61/100), backed by strong 25.7% margins and 14.2% revenue growth. MDU offers better value entry with a 52.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Atmos Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS · USA

Atmos Energy Corporation, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is one of the United States' largest natural-gas-only distributors.

MDU Resources Group Inc

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS · USA

MDU Resources Group, Inc. is involved in the regulated power supply and construction materials and services businesses in the United States. The company is headquartered in Bismarck, North Dakota.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?