WallStSmart

A10 Network (ATEN)vsCrowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 1601% more annual revenue ($5.09B vs $299.42M). ATEN leads profitability with a 14.9% profit margin vs -0.6%. CRWD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 6.22. ATEN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

ATEN

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 2.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.53

CRWD

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 9.3Profit: 2.0Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ATENSignificantly Overvalued (-57.0%)

Margin of Safety

-57.0%

Fair Value

$13.33

Current Price

$29.95

$16.62 premium

UndervaluedFair: $13.33Overvalued
CRWDSignificantly Overvalued (-82.3%)

Margin of Safety

-82.3%

Fair Value

$99.74

Current Price

$179.38

$79.64 premium

UndervaluedFair: $99.74Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ATEN2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
20.2%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 20 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
29.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 29.4% YoY

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$191.86B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.189/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.6%8/10

Revenue surging 25.6% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

ATEN4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
9.7x4/10

Trading at 9.7x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
14.762/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.222/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
39.4x2/10

Trading at 39.4x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
-0.5%2/10

ROE of -0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ATEN

The strongest argument for ATEN centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 13.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 25.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ATEN

The primary concerns for ATEN are Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 58.8x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ATEN profiles as a value stock while CRWD is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 25.6% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (493M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ATEN scores higher overall (55/100 vs 39/100) and 13.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

A10 Network

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

A10 Networks, Inc. offers network solutions in the United States, Japan, other Asia Pacific countries, and EMEA. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?