WallStSmart

Arq Inc (ARQ)vsCECO Environmental Corp. (CECO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

CECO Environmental Corp. generates 632% more annual revenue ($903.17M vs $123.44M). CECO leads profitability with a -3.4% profit margin vs -42.2%. CECO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.44. CECO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).

ARQ

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.5Value: 5.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.51

CECO

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 7.3Profit: 3.5Value: 5.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ARQUndervalued (+64.3%)

Margin of Safety

+64.3%

Fair Value

$10.63

Current Price

$2.20

$8.43 discount

UndervaluedFair: $10.63Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CECO.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ARQ2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.109/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

CECO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
53.7%10/10

Revenue surging 53.7% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ARQ4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.5%4/10

4.5% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.514/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$96.07M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

CECO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.824/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
5.5%3/10

ROE of 5.5% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-41.5%2/10

Earnings declined 41.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ARQ

The strongest argument for ARQ centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : CECO

The strongest argument for CECO centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 53.7% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.44 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ARQ

The primary concerns for ARQ are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : CECO

The primary concerns for CECO are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Operating Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ARQ profiles as a turnaround stock while CECO is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

ARQ carries more volatility with a beta of 2.86 — expect wider price swings.

CECO is growing revenue faster at 53.7% — sustainability is the question.

ARQ generates stronger free cash flow (-4M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CECO scores higher overall (44/100 vs 39/100) and 53.7% revenue growth. ARQ offers better value entry with a 64.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Arq Inc

INDUSTRIALS · POLLUTION & TREATMENT CONTROLS · USA

Arq, Inc. produces activated carbon products in North America. The company is headquartered in Greenwood Village, Colorado.

Visit Website →

CECO Environmental Corp.

INDUSTRIALS · POLLUTION & TREATMENT CONTROLS · USA

CECO Environmental Corporation. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?