WallStSmart

Akamai Technologies Inc (AKAM)vsCrowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 25% more annual revenue ($5.40B vs $4.32B). AKAM leads profitability with a 9.5% profit margin vs 0.8%. AKAM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.07. AKAM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

AKAM

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.56

CRWD

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 9.3Profit: 3.0Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AKAMUndervalued (+27.2%)

Margin of Safety

+27.2%

Fair Value

$152.06

Current Price

$106.79

$45.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $152.06Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CRWD.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AKAM0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Market CapQuality
$211.69B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.169/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.8%8/10

Revenue surging 25.8% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

AKAM4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
38.3x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.564/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.973/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.8%3/10

0.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.682/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AKAM

PEG of 1.07 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 25.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AKAM

The primary concerns for AKAM are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.97 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 5168.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AKAM profiles as a value stock while CRWD is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 25.8% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (406M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AKAM scores higher overall (48/100 vs 43/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Akamai Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Akamai Technologies, Inc. is a global content delivery network (CDN), cybersecurity, and cloud service company, providing web and Internet security services.

Visit Website →

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?