WallStSmart

Adecoagro SA (AGRO)vsBrasilagro Adr (LND)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Adecoagro SA generates 60% more annual revenue ($1.50B vs $938.74M). AGRO leads profitability with a 0.9% profit margin vs -1.6%. AGRO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

AGRO

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.87

LND

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.19
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AGROUndervalued (+32.4%)

Margin of Safety

+32.4%

Fair Value

$13.23

Current Price

$10.31

$2.92 discount

UndervaluedFair: $13.23Overvalued
LNDUndervalued (+62.5%)

Margin of Safety

+62.5%

Fair Value

$10.48

Current Price

$3.67

$6.81 discount

UndervaluedFair: $10.48Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AGRO3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
55.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 55.6% YoY

Revenue GrowthGrowth
22.5%8/10

Revenue surging 22.5% year-over-year

LND1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

AGRO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.47B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
0.8%3/10

ROE of 0.8% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.9%3/10

0.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
0.4%3/10

Operating margin of 0.4%

LND4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$357.62M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-0.1%2/10

ROE of -0.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-15.5%2/10

Revenue declined 15.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AGRO

The strongest argument for AGRO centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 22.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : LND

The strongest argument for LND centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : AGRO

The primary concerns for AGRO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 510.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : LND

The primary concerns for LND are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AGRO profiles as a growth stock while LND is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

LND carries more volatility with a beta of -0.03 — expect wider price swings.

AGRO is growing revenue faster at 22.5% — sustainability is the question.

LND generates stronger free cash flow (-84M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AGRO scores higher overall (54/100 vs 30/100) and 22.5% revenue growth. LND offers better value entry with a 62.5% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Adecoagro SA

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · FARM PRODUCTS · USA

Adecoagro SA is an agro-industrial company in South America. The company is headquartered in Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

Brasilagro Adr

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · FARM PRODUCTS · USA

BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrcolas is dedicated to the acquisition, development, exploration and sale of rural properties suitable for agricultural activities in Brazil. The company is headquartered in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?