WallStSmart

AGCO Corporation (AGCO)vsLindsay Corporation (LNN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

AGCO Corporation generates 1414% more annual revenue ($10.08B vs $665.90M). LNN leads profitability with a 11.0% profit margin vs 7.2%. AGCO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.14. AGCO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

AGCO

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 10.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.26

LNN

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AGCOUndervalued (+69.7%)

Margin of Safety

+69.7%

Fair Value

$456.30

Current Price

$117.36

$338.94 discount

UndervaluedFair: $456.30Overvalued
LNNSignificantly Overvalued (-191.2%)

Margin of Safety

-191.2%

Fair Value

$46.24

Current Price

$120.54

$74.30 premium

UndervaluedFair: $46.24Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AGCO2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

LNN2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
17.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

AGCO2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.2%3/10

7.2% margin — thin

LNN4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$1.28B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-6.3%2/10

Revenue declined 6.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-1.9%2/10

Earnings declined 1.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-15.07M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AGCO

The strongest argument for AGCO centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.14 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LNN

The strongest argument for LNN centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.17 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : AGCO

The primary concerns for AGCO are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : LNN

The primary concerns for LNN are Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AGCO profiles as a value stock while LNN is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

AGCO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.11 — expect wider price swings.

AGCO is growing revenue faster at 1.1% — sustainability is the question.

AGCO generates stronger free cash flow (675M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AGCO scores higher overall (68/100 vs 52/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AGCO Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

AGCO Corporation manufactures and distributes agricultural equipment and related spare parts worldwide. The company is headquartered in Duluth, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Lindsay Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Lindsay Corporation provides road infrastructure and water management products and services in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Omaha, Nebraska.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?