WallStSmart

AGCO Corporation (AGCO)vsGoldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Goldman Sachs Group Inc generates 489% more annual revenue ($59.40B vs $10.08B). GS leads profitability with a 28.9% profit margin vs 7.2%. AGCO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.14. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).

AGCO

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 10.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.26

GS

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.7Profit: 7.5Value: 10.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AGCOUndervalued (+69.7%)

Margin of Safety

+69.7%

Fair Value

$456.30

Current Price

$117.36

$338.94 discount

UndervaluedFair: $456.30Overvalued
GSUndervalued (+52.4%)

Margin of Safety

+52.4%

Fair Value

$1768.48

Current Price

$841.84

$926.64 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1768.48Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AGCO2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

GS6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$250.66B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
38.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 38.3%

Profit MarginProfitability
28.9%9/10

Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
16.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.2%8/10

15.2% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

AGCO2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.2%3/10

7.2% margin — thin

GS1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$-16.81B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AGCO

The strongest argument for AGCO centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.14 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : GS

The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.9% and operating margin at 38.3%. Revenue growth of 15.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AGCO

The primary concerns for AGCO are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : GS

The primary concerns for GS are Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AGCO profiles as a value stock while GS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

GS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.34 — expect wider price swings.

GS is growing revenue faster at 15.2% — sustainability is the question.

AGCO generates stronger free cash flow (675M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GS scores higher overall (73/100 vs 68/100), backed by strong 28.9% margins and 15.2% revenue growth. AGCO offers better value entry with a 69.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AGCO Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

AGCO Corporation manufactures and distributes agricultural equipment and related spare parts worldwide. The company is headquartered in Duluth, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Goldman Sachs Group Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?