WallStSmart

The AES Corporation (AES)vsVistra Energy Corp (VST)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Vistra Energy Corp generates 45% more annual revenue ($17.74B vs $12.23B). AES leads profitability with a 7.4% profit margin vs 5.3%. AES appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.09. AES earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C).

AES

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.44

VST

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 3.3Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AESUndervalued (+9.3%)

Margin of Safety

+9.3%

Fair Value

$18.13

Current Price

$14.45

$3.68 discount

UndervaluedFair: $18.13Overvalued
VSTSignificantly Overvalued (-54.4%)

Margin of Safety

-54.4%

Fair Value

$100.34

Current Price

$153.79

$53.45 premium

UndervaluedFair: $100.34Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AES2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

VST1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$53.44B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

AES4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.7%4/10

4.7% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.9%3/10

ROE of 1.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.4%3/10

7.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

VST4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
19.8x4/10

Trading at 19.8x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
5.3%3/10

5.3% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
72.4x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AES

The strongest argument for AES centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.09 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : VST

The strongest argument for VST centers on Market Cap. Revenue growth of 13.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.36 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : AES

The primary concerns for AES are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 7.98 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : VST

The primary concerns for VST are Price/Book, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 72.4x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 3.36 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

VST carries more volatility with a beta of 1.50 — expect wider price swings.

VST is growing revenue faster at 13.6% — sustainability is the question.

AES generates stronger free cash flow (-47M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - DIVERSIFIED industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

AES scores higher overall (55/100 vs 53/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

The AES Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - DIVERSIFIED · USA

The AES Corporation is a Fortune 500 company that generates and distributes electrical power. AES is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia.

Visit Website →

Vistra Energy Corp

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Vistra Corp. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?