WallStSmart

The AES Corporation (AES)vsUNITIL Corporation (UTL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

The AES Corporation generates 2182% more annual revenue ($12.23B vs $536.00M). UTL leads profitability with a 9.4% profit margin vs 7.4%. AES appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.09. UTL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

AES

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.44

UTL

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.5Value: 6.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.68
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AESSignificantly Overvalued (-84.5%)

Margin of Safety

-84.5%

Fair Value

$8.91

Current Price

$14.06

$5.15 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.91Overvalued
UTLUndervalued (+16.5%)

Margin of Safety

+16.5%

Fair Value

$61.06

Current Price

$52.41

$8.65 discount

UndervaluedFair: $61.06Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AES2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

UTL4 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
17.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
21.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.7%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
26.7%8/10

Revenue surging 26.7% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

AES4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.7%4/10

4.7% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.9%3/10

ROE of 1.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.4%3/10

7.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

UTL4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$928.15M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Debt/EquityHealth
1.543/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.372/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AES

The strongest argument for AES centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.09 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : UTL

The strongest argument for UTL centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 26.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AES

The primary concerns for AES are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 7.98 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : UTL

The primary concerns for UTL are Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 1.54 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AES profiles as a value stock while UTL is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

AES carries more volatility with a beta of 0.94 — expect wider price swings.

UTL is growing revenue faster at 26.7% — sustainability is the question.

UTL generates stronger free cash flow (-36M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UTL scores higher overall (60/100 vs 55/100) and 26.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

The AES Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - DIVERSIFIED · USA

The AES Corporation is a Fortune 500 company that generates and distributes electrical power. AES is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia.

Visit Website →

UNITIL Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Unitil Corporation, a utility holding company, is engaged in the distribution of electricity and natural gas. The company is headquartered in Hampton, New Hampshire.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?