WallStSmart

Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp (ADPT)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waters Corporation generates 1176% more annual revenue ($3.77B vs $295.41M). WAT leads profitability with a 11.9% profit margin vs -16.8%. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

ADPT

Avoid

30

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: -2.53

WAT

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 3.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ADPTUndervalued (+50.3%)

Margin of Safety

+50.3%

Fair Value

$31.45

Current Price

$16.90

$14.55 discount

UndervaluedFair: $31.45Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-84.6%)

Margin of Safety

-84.6%

Fair Value

$178.29

Current Price

$365.36

$187.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $178.29Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ADPT1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
35.1%10/10

Revenue surging 35.1% year-over-year

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.4%10/10

Revenue surging 91.4% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.8510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

ADPT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
12.4x4/10

Trading at 12.4x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
-23.0%2/10

ROE of -23.0% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-10.33M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.604/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.5x4/10

Trading at 8.5x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
2.9%3/10

ROE of 2.9% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

Operating margin of 2.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ADPT

The strongest argument for ADPT centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 35.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ADPT

The primary concerns for ADPT are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 45.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ADPT profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WAT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

ADPT carries more volatility with a beta of 2.15 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.4% — sustainability is the question.

ADPT generates stronger free cash flow (-10M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (50/100 vs 30/100) and 91.4% revenue growth. ADPT offers better value entry with a 50.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation, a commercial-stage company, develops an immune medicine platform for the diagnosis and treatment of various diseases. The company is headquartered in Seattle, Washington.

Visit Website →

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?