WallStSmart

Ambev SA ADR (ABEV)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ambev SA ADR generates 2688% more annual revenue ($88.24B vs $3.17B). WAT leads profitability with a 20.3% profit margin vs 17.6%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.25. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

ABEV

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.7Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.39

WAT

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 9.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ABEVSignificantly Overvalued (-136.4%)

Margin of Safety

-136.4%

Fair Value

$1.29

Current Price

$2.85

$1.56 premium

UndervaluedFair: $1.29Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-349.9%)

Margin of Safety

-349.9%

Fair Value

$73.17

Current Price

$302.32

$229.15 premium

UndervaluedFair: $73.17Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ABEV4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$11.62B10/10

Generating 11.6B in free cash flow

P/E RatioValuation
14.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.2%

WAT4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
29.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
20.3%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

ABEV3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.024/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-8.2%2/10

Revenue declined 8.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-10.1%2/10

Earnings declined 10.1%

WAT2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.1%2/10

Earnings declined 3.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ABEV

The strongest argument for ABEV centers on Free Cash Flow, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.6% and operating margin at 28.2%.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Operating Margin, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.3% and operating margin at 33.8%. PEG of 1.25 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ABEV

The primary concerns for ABEV are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ABEV profiles as a declining stock while WAT is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 6.8% — sustainability is the question.

ABEV generates stronger free cash flow (11.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (60/100 vs 55/100), backed by strong 20.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ambev SA ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - BREWERS · USA

Ambev SA produces, distributes and sells beer, draft beer, carbonated soft drinks (CSD), other non-alcoholic beverages, malt and food products in the Americas. The company is headquartered in So Paulo, Brazil.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?